Cannabis and Synthetic Cannabinoids Are Used for Different Reasons: Comparing Functional Motives of Use Based on the European Web Survey on Drugs

Summary information for this document is not currently available.

PDF files are made available as a convenience. In cases where the EUDA is not the originator of the document, please be aware that any PDFs available on this page may not be authoritative or there may be more recent versions available. While we make every effort to ensure that these files are definitive, before using or citing them, we recommend that you consult the publisher's website or contact the author(s) to check for more recent versions.

Abstract

This abstract is provided here as a convenience only. Check the publisher's website (if available) for the definitive version.
Synthetic cannabinoids (SCs) first emerged in Europe during the 2000s, becoming widely accessible over the 2010s. Despite their known high health risks, little is understood about users’ motives for choosing SCs. The 2021 European Web Survey on Drugs (EWSD) reached 48,427 valid respondents from 22 European countries who use drugs. Motives of cannabis and synthetic cannabinoid use were compared while controlling for age and gender effects by logistic regression. Among participants, 93.1% reported last year cannabis use and 4.1% last year synthetic cannabinoid use. The motives of reducing stress, getting high, and enhancing performance and curiosity proved to be more pronounced in the case of cannabis use than in the case of the use of SCs, while the motivation of reducing pain/inflammations was more pronounced in the case of SC use. The findings indicate distinct functional motives underlying the use of cannabis and SCs, demonstrating that SCs serve different needs than cannabis and can no longer be regarded as its substitute. While curiosity was a predominant motive for SC use in the early 2010s, the primary drivers of use shifted by the early 2020s.
Top